Application Scoring Rubric

Q1: List two goals you want to accomplish. How will the MACS curriculum and/or program goals help you achieve them?  Be specific and consider how a degree in marine science will help you achieve your long-term goals.

5

3

1

Scoring notes

Goals are clearly articulated and the student has made an exceptionally compelling case for why a degree in marine science is central to reaching this/these goal/goals. 

A moderately compelling case is made; goals are stated and a tie to MACS is evident but not specific or compelling. 

A weak case is made without any reference to MACS curriculum or goals. One or more component may be missing. 

5-3: A compelling case would contain clear goals and explicitly tie to this program. 

1: Goals are ill-defined or a tie to MACS curriculum is lacking 

Q2: Obtaining a science degree takes commitment. Describe a past experience in which you persevered through a challenging situation and what you learned that might help you to succeed in the MACS program.

5

3

1

Scoring notes

An exceptionally compelling case is made. Concrete examples are well articulated. Lessons learned are eloquently discussed in the context of how they may specifically be utilized in the MACS program.

The student has made a moderately compelling case, but only with general examples of experiences and learning outcomes. Only connects their lessons learned in a general way to the MACS program.

The student has made a weak case without clear examples of interests or experiences and no obvious connection between lessons learned and the MACS program.

Student should articulate formative experiences, not necessarily related to marine and coastal science. Inexperience should not disqualify, as long as interest is articulated with strong examples.  

Q3: The MACS program is cohort-based. We value collaborating to solve complex problems. Explain your thoughts on the role of diverse perspectives in science and describe an experience (either academic or non-academic) that has prepared you to work effectively on teams with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

5

3

1

Scoring notes

An exceptionally compelling case is made. A relevant experience is described and the value of a diverse group of people is articulated. 

Moderately compelling case is made. Both elements are present, but the experience is described only generally. 

A weak case is made without a clear description of a relevant experience 

5: The value and importance of diverse perspectives and background experiences are clearly important to the student. 

Student should describe why the group they were in was diverse (diversity could be based on student circumstances, gender, age, race etc.). Student should recognize different types of diversity and be able to speak to at least one type in this essay.  

Q4: Is there anything else that you would like our selection committee to know about you that may provide valuable context to your application or academic history? (Optional question, 300 word limit)

Scoring Notes: Student can use this space to explain unusual circumstances resulting in e.g., below-average grades and/or provide a reason not sought in other spaces for why MACS is the program for them.